Friday, July 24, 2009

"I didn't do it - please no wet towel and black rubber hose!"

Good Day Readers:
The Public Eye has posted the following item on their site. We'd like to assure you we're not the blindfolded individual being interrogated in the photograph nor do we recognize the other two "gentleman." However, they do not appear to be Manitoba Metis Federation President David Chartrand
or longtime MMF taxpayer financed minimum $250 hourly lawyer Murray Norman Trachtenberg.
TPE has done it to us again with another of their metaphoric photographs. Anyone recognize the individuals in the picture and the name of the movie? Please don't leave us hanging like this Public Eye!
Clare L. Pieuk
24 July 2009
Manitoba Lawyer Murray Trachtenberg and "MMF et al"

Barristers, Solicitors & Notaries Public
710-491 Portage Avenue
Winnipeg, MB R3B 2E4
Fax: (204) 944-8878

Gerald S. Posner
Manitoba & Ontario Bars

Murray N. Trachtenberg, B.A., LL.B.
Direct Line: (204) 940-9602

May 1, 2006

Mr. Clare L. Pieuk
2 - 371 Des Meurons Street
Winnipeg, Manitoba R2H 2N6

Dear Mr. Pieuk:

Re: MMF et al vs. Clare L. Pieuk et al
Queen's Bench File No. CI 05-01-41955

My File No. 2003-20

This is further to our attendance this morning before Madam Justice McCawley and in accordance with the order she has pronounced. She has directed that you and Mr. Belhumeur identify the name or names of any individual who provided you with copies of any internal documents of the various corporations listed in the Amended Notice of Motion including but not limited to the Manitoba Metis Federation Inc.

She has also ordered that you provide those names forthwith.

At the conclusion of this mornings hearing, I asked you when you were going to be able to comply with that part of the order. You did not give me a definitive answer.

This will constitute a further request that you comply with the order and provide me with those names forthwith.

Yours truly,
An Association of Independent Lawyers


Blogger The Mad Bomber said...

The source of this photo I'm going to leave to you and your resourceful readers. Partly because I value independent thought, partly because I am not sure myself (this photo is the one that consistently came up on repeated Google searches).

As for the broader metaphor in the choice of this photo - and there is one, one that makes this ideal for your involvement in this asinine lawsuit - I do have my own thoughts. I won't share them at this time, however.

2:17 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home