Monday, September 14, 2009

We don't have them - yet!

Disgruntled MMFer has left a new comment on your post "Veritas Aequitas!"

When are you going to publish Jack Park's answers ?
MMF Board of Director Plaintiff Jack Park
Dear Disgruntled:

Thank you for writing. Manitoba Metis Federation lawyer Murray Trachtenberg refused to provide answers on behalf of his client when requested (January 2008) claiming (October 2008) the questions were "irrelevant, scandalous and vexatious" - unfortunately, you'll have to wait until the trial. At that time, the Defendants will have their first opportunity to directly confront Mr. Park (and all the Plaintiffs) under oath when he's cross-examined before a judge, jury and courtoom full of spectators.;

We plan to provide complete coverage of the trial and another Blog has advised us they'll do the same. Trials are electronically recorded (in case there's an appeal). Written transcripts are available from the Court - at a price of course.

Clare L. Pieuk


Anonymous Anonymous said...

"irrelevant, scandalous and vexatious"?

These are lawyer weasal words. They translate to-Boy do we have something to hide!

These questions should be put to Mr. Park next time he stands for re election.

Come on Jack ol boy, you don't have any secrets from your Metis constituents-do you ??

8:25 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home