Saturday, May 03, 2008

Hope this clarifies the situation!

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Guilty!"

What is this we hear about Terry being paid by the lawyer for giving information to the MMF? Is that not bribery and illegal?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Anonymous:

Thank you for writing. Based on the very limited information provided, we're assuming you're referring to the Manitoba Metis Federation's taxpayer funded defamation lawsuit against www.CyberSmokeSignals.com.

As we increaingly position this site to go deeper into the Blogosphere, it's extremely important to clarify possible misinformation. We're guessing you probably mean the letter written by Counselor Trachtenberg displayed below. If not and you have any other evidence, please bring it forward (You can remain anonymous!) so we can check it out and report back.

A few years ago Terry Belhumeur advised us he maintained a Post Office Box in Gunton, Manitoba for his business (T.B. Outfitting), however, Counselor Trachtenberg is well aware of his permanent Winnipeg address. Why he was paid a travel allowance is beyond us.

Sincerely,
Clare L. Pieuk
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
POSNER & TRACHTENBERG
Barristers, Solicitors & Notaries Public
710-491 Portage Avenue
Winnipeg, MB R3B 2E4
Fax: (204) 944-8878


Gerald S. Posner
Manitoba & Ontario Bars


Murrray N. Trachtenberg, B.A., LL.B.
Direct Line: (204) 940-9602
e-mail:
mtrachtenberg@ptlaw.mb.ca
______________________________________
August 17, 2007


Mr. Terry Belhumeur
P.O. Box 166
Gunton, Manitoba R0C 1H0

Dear Mr. Belhumeur:

Re: MMF et al vs. Terry Belhumeur et al
Queen's Bench File No. CI 05-01-41955
My File No. 2003-20


Enclosed please find the following:

1. Notice of Examination; and

2. My cheque payable to you in the amount of $50.20.

The Notice of Examination is for an examination for discovery at my office on Thursday, September 6, 2007 at 9:30 a.m. The documents mentioned in subrule 30.04 of the Queen's Bench Rules referred to in the Notice are the documents required to be disclosed and produced by way of your affidavit of documents. My letter of yesterday explained your obligation to produce such an affidavit.

The Court of Bench Rules also provide that you are entitled to the following payment:

1. Attendance money
$25 per 1/2 day

2. Travel allowence
52.5k x 2 = 105k x $.24 per k
= $25.20
======
Total $50.20


In the event you fail to attend at the examination for discovery, the Court may make such order as it sees fit including striking out you statement of defence.

Yours truly,
MURRAY N. TRACHTENBERG

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nooooooooo, only $25 is for travel, the other money is paying him for his testimony. He has a lot to answer for !

3:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, only 25 bucks is for travel the rest is for him to talk

4:38 PM  
Blogger Darrel said...

don't understand this payment program, LRCC never paid me for 2 trips to wpg (200 miles one waY} to ask these stupid questions . but again I wasn't on the MMF payroll

6:37 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home