Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!

Tully Vorcheux has left a new comment on your post, "MMF plaintiffs and counsel: "Go ahead knock yourself our make our day!"

There are two great new jokes making the rounds here:

Q. What is the difference between Clare Pieuk and David Chartrand?

A. Nobody pretends Clare Pieuk is Metis (as far as I am concerned you have just as much right to be MMF President as David Chartrand - in other words, no right at all!)

The other:

Q. What is the difference between Terry Belhumeur and David Chartrand?

A. One doesn't know when to quit, one doesn't know when to try (You know both men, guess which is which?)

Cheers, good luck at your trial. Smack the Plaintiffs asses from here until next Tuesday!

Tully Vorcheux

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Tully Vorcheux:

Thank you for writing again. As you can see, our readers really liked your jokes.

The Indian Act is over 100 years old, therefore, does not reflect many of today's realities. But one small example, it's silent on the issue of conflict of interest. A Blogger mentioned a non-Aboriginal somewhere had actually become a Chief hence our e-mail question to Minister Chuck Strahl and his Parliamentary Secretary Rod Bruinooge.

We appreciate your support and will do our best - that is, try for a Friday.

Sincerely,

Clare L. Pieuk

P.S. We're curious. In which part of the province do you live?