Thursday, January 28, 2010

Another Plaintiff withdraws!

Good Day Readers:

We just received the paperwork from MMF lawyer Murray Trachtenberg (www.ptlaw.mb.ca; mtrachtenberg@ptlaw.mb.ca) so can now discuss with you the latest Plaintiff to abandon his taxpayer financed claim against CyberSmokeSignals in the Federation's defamation lawsuit. It's former Interlake Regional Vice-President William Flett.

Mr. Flett ceased being a Provincial Board of Director June 26, 2006 so presumably his legal fees since then were paid using public money. This is significant because our information is he was the Director who either tabled a motion to sue CSS or seconded it - we believe the latter. We thank the gentleman for making a very prudent decision.

Three Plaintiffs remain who since June 29, 2006 continue to have their legal fees paid by taxpayers. They are (left to right) Rita Cullen, Darryl Montgomery and Joyce Langan. Anyone know if they'll be running in this year's election?

This bring the number to 5 who have signed Notices of Discontinuance the others being Richard DeLaRonde, Bonnie McIntyre, Darrel Desdlauriers and Rosemarie McPherson. Ron Chartrand Vice-President, Winnipeg Region was never part of the lawsuit.

Clare L. Pieuk

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE QUEEN'S BENCH WINNIPEG CENTRE

BETWEEN:

MANITOBA METIS FEDERATION INC., ANITA CAMPBELL, DAVID CHARTRAND, ELBERT CHARTRAND, RITA CULLEN, JEAN DESROSIERS, JOHN FLEURY, LAURA HYRICH, JULYDA LAGIMODIERE, JOYCE LANGAN, LEAH LAPLANTE, JUDY MAYER, DARRYL MONTGOMERY, MARILEE NAULT, JACK PARK, CLAIRE RIDDLE, and DENISE THOMAS,

plaintiffs,

- and -

TERRY BELHUMEUR and CLARE L. PIEUK

defendants.

Notice of Discontinuance

1. A statement of claim in this action has been served

2. The plaintiff William Flett wholly discontinus his claim against the defendants, without costs to any of the parties. The within Notice of Discontinuance shall constitute a defence to any subsequent action as contemplated by Queen's Bench Rule 23.02(1).

January 17, 2010

POSNER & TRACHTENBERG

Per: Murray N. Trachtenberg/Counsel for the plaintiffs

CONSENTED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:

Per: Clare L. Pieuk Terry Belhumeur

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whaa Wha... Should all go down like dominOs' now. Wonderful, thank you Mr. flett for coming to your senses... better late than before the you know what hits the fan.

OOhhh I'm so happy, happy, happy...

O.

5:50 PM  
Anonymous Red Baron said...

There will be more to drop out amd probably right before the trial. Almost none of the plaintiffs now want a DAMN thing to do with this lawsuit. The only people who still want this damfool thing to go ahead are Murray and the Chartrands.

10:16 PM  
Anonymous Tully Vorcheux said...

ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST . . . THEY ARE DROPPING LIKE FLIES

Maybe they dont trust Murray and David to protect them from your cross examination questions ?

10:37 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home