The blind leading the blind?
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post, "An ethics test for MMF plaintiffs and counsel!
I'm sure taxpayer funded MMF attack dawg will be able to perform the necessary research to provide the MMF Plaintiffs the proper ethical answers!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Anonymous:
Thank you for writing. It's well into the day and we're getting depressed because we've yet to have an MT=empty posting so here it is.
Unlike former CyberSmokeSignals General Legal Counsel Lionel Chartrand and now Wetaskiwin, Alberta Crown Prosecutor (wrote allegedly defamatory petition, suggested it be posted and did not advise the Co-Defendants it might contain defamatory matererial) who obviously skipped or slept through his Intellectual Property classes (i.e. Defamation Law), the obsessive compulsive, anally fixated MMF taxpayer financed lawyer Murray Trachtenberg didn't.
www.ptlaw.mb.ca; mtrachtenberg@ptlaw.mb.ca
We're not convinced the highly ethical Mr. Trachtenberg will be able to coach his dummy Plaintiffs in how to pass the test.
ANITA CAMPBELL (Don't support!)
DAVID CHARTRAND (Don't re-elect!)
ELBERT CHARTRAND (Don't re-elect!)
JEAN DESROSIERS (Don't re-elect!)
JOHN FLEURY (Don't re-elect!)
LAURA HYRICH (Don't re-elect!)
JULYDA LAGIMODIERE (Don't support!)
LEAH LAPLANTE (Don't support!)
JUDY MAYER (Don't re-elect!)
MARILEE NAULT (Don't re-elect!)
JACK PARK (Don't re-elect!)
CLAIRE RIDDLE (Don't re-elect!)
DENISE THOMAS (Don't support!)
Sincerely,
Clare L. Pieuk



1 Comments:
What was defamatory about Lionel's Petition that causes you to say "....did not advise the Co-Defendants it might contain defamatory matererial) who obviously skipped or slept through his Intellectual Property classes"??? Your other lawyer Neiderhoffer stated that you looked forward to putting the evidence to a jury to show the allegations were correct!
Which is correct??
Oilfield Michif
Post a Comment
<< Home