Wonder what "Big Julie" thinks of this? CyberSmokeBlog likes it!
Good Day Readers:
This is the second time Maxime Bernier may be right. While it's fine, well and good the Liberals with their new found economic guru shining Larry Summers in armour on a white horse propose greater levels of public debt here's the problem.
The Harper government finally balanced the budget last year on the backs of Canadians at considerable pain. To make matters worse, there's a surplus now which could be put to work. However, the Harperites will sit on it until just before the 2015 election is announced, hand down another budget then distribute the surplus, "Jeeze taxpayers it's larger than we thought!" to buy votes - buying voters with their own money you might say. Further, Conservative politicians and their senior bureaucrats didn't suffer like the rest of you continuing to dine on fine cuisine as a spat of recent media reports suggest.
Larry Summers is not the savior on a white horse the Liberalites would have you believe. Besides, he comes with baggage something conveniently overlooked at the Liberal convention.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Summers
After squeezing taxpayers to finally balance the books why not keep it that way? Run consecutive surpluses and use part to pay down debt. Do you not think foreign investors both public and private prefer to place their money in jurisdictions with a strong fiscal track record instead of a debt burdened economy?
And the second time? His choice of women - the little rascal!
Sincerely,
Clare L. Pieuk
Maxime Bernier: More liberal debt is not the road to growth
Maxime Bernier, Special to National Post
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
The "Debt Wagon" should be placed permanently outside the Langevin Block Building window to the Prime Minister's Office and placed on flashing mode during its weekly Wednesday scrumptious taxpayer lunches. A second should be anchored outside his bedroom window at 24 Sussex Drive so that's the last thing he sees before going to bed and the first when he arises. (CyberSmokeBlog)
Now that its Montreal convention is over, we know a little bit more about the Liberal party’s economic platform. One of its central planks is that budget deficits are a good way to grow the economy, and that we should not be afraid to go further into debt.
In a recent video posted on the Internet, Liberal leader Justin Trudeau explains that Canadian households are heavily indebted, just like provincial governments, while the federal government has considerably lowered its debt level compared with other developed countries since the 1990s. His conclusion: Ottawa is the only entity with the ability to spend money and rack up more debt. It, therefore, has to “step up” and do the spending that others are not able to do.
Are we in a recession? Does the current situation justify sending our public finances back into the red?
One could almost believe we’re back in the 1970s, when the federal debt, which until then was relatively modest, exploded as Justin Trudeau’s father launched one new program after another, most of the time by intervening in provincial jurisdictions. We saw where that led us in terms of public finance, but also with regard to federal-provincial relations.
Delegates at the Liberal convention discussed a whole set of “national strategies” on issues ranging from transportation to energy, mental health, children, water, pharmacare, youth jobs and science. This is the type of big spending, interventionist and centralizing federal government that Justin Trudeau is once again proposing.
They may claim they intend to remain fiscally responsible, but Liberals are actually going down a very slippery slope, as they adopt these kinds of policies.
The burden of debt diminished considerably during the first three years of the Conservative government — from 34% to 28% of GDP. It has gone back to 33% in the past couple of years due to measures taken to deal with the financial crisis. Our projections show that it should be scaled back to 25% of GDP by 2021.
Justin Trudeau and his American adviser still believe in the old Keynesian theory that says government can create wealth by spending more money.
In reality, every time the government takes an additional dollar in taxes out of someone’s pocket, it’s a dollar that person will not be able to spend or invest. When government spending goes up, private spending goes down. There is no net effect. No wealth creation.
Government borrowing has the same effect. The private lenders who lend money to the government will have less money to lend to private businesses. When government borrowing and spending go up, private borrowing and spending go down. There is no net effect. No wealth creation.
It is like taking a bucket of water in the deep end of a swimming pool and emptying it in the shallow end.
It’s these kind of policies that ruined our economy in the 1970s. This is not what Canada needs today.
To stimulate the economy, we need to give entrepreneurs the means to create wealth. We need to put in place the best possible conditions to allow the private sector to become more productive: by curtailing public spending, cutting taxes and signing free-trade agreements. Growth and progress depend on more economic freedom.
Maxime Bernier is the Minister of State for Small Business, Tourism and Agriculture.
This is the second time Maxime Bernier may be right. While it's fine, well and good the Liberals with their new found economic guru shining Larry Summers in armour on a white horse propose greater levels of public debt here's the problem.
The Harper government finally balanced the budget last year on the backs of Canadians at considerable pain. To make matters worse, there's a surplus now which could be put to work. However, the Harperites will sit on it until just before the 2015 election is announced, hand down another budget then distribute the surplus, "Jeeze taxpayers it's larger than we thought!" to buy votes - buying voters with their own money you might say. Further, Conservative politicians and their senior bureaucrats didn't suffer like the rest of you continuing to dine on fine cuisine as a spat of recent media reports suggest.
Larry Summers is not the savior on a white horse the Liberalites would have you believe. Besides, he comes with baggage something conveniently overlooked at the Liberal convention.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Summers
After squeezing taxpayers to finally balance the books why not keep it that way? Run consecutive surpluses and use part to pay down debt. Do you not think foreign investors both public and private prefer to place their money in jurisdictions with a strong fiscal track record instead of a debt burdened economy?
And the second time? His choice of women - the little rascal!
Sincerely,
Clare L. Pieuk
Maxime Bernier: More liberal debt is not the road to growth
Maxime Bernier, Special to National Post
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
The "Debt Wagon" should be placed permanently outside the Langevin Block Building window to the Prime Minister's Office and placed on flashing mode during its weekly Wednesday scrumptious taxpayer lunches. A second should be anchored outside his bedroom window at 24 Sussex Drive so that's the last thing he sees before going to bed and the first when he arises. (CyberSmokeBlog)
Now that its Montreal convention is over, we know a little bit more about the Liberal party’s economic platform. One of its central planks is that budget deficits are a good way to grow the economy, and that we should not be afraid to go further into debt.
In a recent video posted on the Internet, Liberal leader Justin Trudeau explains that Canadian households are heavily indebted, just like provincial governments, while the federal government has considerably lowered its debt level compared with other developed countries since the 1990s. His conclusion: Ottawa is the only entity with the ability to spend money and rack up more debt. It, therefore, has to “step up” and do the spending that others are not able to do.
"Every time the government takes a dollar out of someone’s pocket, it’s a dollar that person will not be able to spend or invest."At last weekend’s convention, Liberal delegates heard Larry Summers, an American economist, explain why we need “unconventional support policies” - economic jargon for “spending without restraint.” According to him, accumulating more debt is OK when it serves to stimulate the economy.
Are we in a recession? Does the current situation justify sending our public finances back into the red?
One could almost believe we’re back in the 1970s, when the federal debt, which until then was relatively modest, exploded as Justin Trudeau’s father launched one new program after another, most of the time by intervening in provincial jurisdictions. We saw where that led us in terms of public finance, but also with regard to federal-provincial relations.
Delegates at the Liberal convention discussed a whole set of “national strategies” on issues ranging from transportation to energy, mental health, children, water, pharmacare, youth jobs and science. This is the type of big spending, interventionist and centralizing federal government that Justin Trudeau is once again proposing.
They may claim they intend to remain fiscally responsible, but Liberals are actually going down a very slippery slope, as they adopt these kinds of policies.
The burden of debt diminished considerably during the first three years of the Conservative government — from 34% to 28% of GDP. It has gone back to 33% in the past couple of years due to measures taken to deal with the financial crisis. Our projections show that it should be scaled back to 25% of GDP by 2021.
"Servicing the debt costs taxpayers about $30-billion a year. This is as much money as the GST brings into government coffers."This debt is not something abstract. Servicing the debt costs taxpayers about $30-billion a year. This is as much money as the GST brings into government coffers. The more we cut down the size of the debt, the fewer resources we will need to pay the interest and the more we will be able to afford to cut taxes.
Justin Trudeau and his American adviser still believe in the old Keynesian theory that says government can create wealth by spending more money.
In reality, every time the government takes an additional dollar in taxes out of someone’s pocket, it’s a dollar that person will not be able to spend or invest. When government spending goes up, private spending goes down. There is no net effect. No wealth creation.
Government borrowing has the same effect. The private lenders who lend money to the government will have less money to lend to private businesses. When government borrowing and spending go up, private borrowing and spending go down. There is no net effect. No wealth creation.
It is like taking a bucket of water in the deep end of a swimming pool and emptying it in the shallow end.
It’s these kind of policies that ruined our economy in the 1970s. This is not what Canada needs today.
To stimulate the economy, we need to give entrepreneurs the means to create wealth. We need to put in place the best possible conditions to allow the private sector to become more productive: by curtailing public spending, cutting taxes and signing free-trade agreements. Growth and progress depend on more economic freedom.
Maxime Bernier is the Minister of State for Small Business, Tourism and Agriculture.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home